The Freddy Will Blog

    Never Ignoring the Original Truth

    I will begin this discussion by stating that I based this argument upon an open debate. It is not a theological critique. I am a Christian who believes in the Bible. I attended Catholic schools where they baptized and confirmed me as a Catholic. Nevertheless, I have made it my responsibility to observe Christianity in the same manner as Yashua and his thirteen disciples. My question is, how did this religion go from the Hebrews to the Church? How did [Hebrew] Yashua become the [Caucasian] Jesus Christ? Did the Romans intend to execute a completely different religion from that of the original doctrine? Is so why? Their pagan religions worked just fine. How is Christianity different today from what they practiced before?

    The Apostle Paul was a Roman. That translates to being an Italian.

    The religious conversion from Hebrew to the Church is a motive why Paul may have been a smudge to Christianity. Yahshua and his thirteen disciples are Jews. Every Prophet before him was a Jew. The Prophet Muhammad (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) is an Arab. That means, along with Judaism, Christianity and Islam are religions of the Middle East. Keep in mind that the Romans were incredibly egotistical. They perceived the Jews as subordinates. Is it possible that they transformed a Jewish and Middle Eastern mythology, to their state religion, by turning it into a European essence? The Apostle Paul was a Roman. That translates to Italian. Now, don’t get me wrong. I love Italy, along with most aspects of Italian culture.

    I do not claim that there is anything wrong with Paul being a Roman. However, when you do the math, the authenticity of modern Christianity, you come across a crucial question. How did this seemingly Middle Eastern mythology become the European faith? We know that the Romans were heretics at that time. We also know that the crucified Yahshua under that same pretext. Everyone knows that after Yahshua’s death/resurrection/ascension, the Romans tracked and killed at least ten of the thirteen disciples. As a Roman, Paul was an enemy. Christians had the vulnerability to forgiveness. Is it possible that Paul’s conversion was a strategy for infiltrating the underground Christian movement? Today, one can argue that they ended the faith.

    The European influence on Christianity was race-based from the beginning. 

    One could easily state that after infiltrating the movement, Paul became sympathetic. That is what also justifies his assassination. However, you cannot ignore the fact that Paul’s influence was so profound. It altered Christianity’s course from the Middle East to Europe. The Romans finally decided to stop persecuting Christians. They proceeded to proclaim it as their state religion. Eventually, Yashua became Jesus, the Hebrews became the Church. They instilled agnostic customs, rituals, and holidays into the fabrication and organized it as a religion. Yet they also removed the religion far away from the original doctrines of Yashua and his thirteen disciples. Today’s Christianity is a spiritually inactive copy of European mythology.

    For my Pentecostal, Seventh Day Adventists, and Born Again Christians, I say you are on the right path. Except for the fact that you pray to Roman idols instead of the God you seek. My proof for saying that is in the lack of answers to your prayers. Every so often, you hit and miss, but for the most part, you are much closer to the right path. If you want to prove me wrong, I challenge you to say your next prayers to Yahweh in the name of Yahshua and see if you don’t get answers. From the very beginning, the Europeans based their influence on ethnicity. That is why they replaced God, the messiah, and his disciples with Caucasians. From then on, you will see that the bible itself is a concoction that was stripped from the original scripture.*

    RELATED ARTICLES

    Saying Never to the Readily Available Free Pornography on the Internet

    Our civilization has gone through more than twenty years with instantly accessible [free] pornography on the web. In these twenty years, we have experienced a pioneering mobile phone revolution that has put the Internet in our pockets, twenty-four hours, and seven days all year long. That is at the same time when the genetic coding of most men dictates that every attractive woman we meet for the first time will arouse us sexually.

    My Reaction to Naughty Dog’s Heartbreaking Video Game, “The Last of Us Part II”

    I have made a climactic shift in the way I socialize with people. It’s not only that. These days, you won’t find me looking for new musicians, inviting strangers to see the latest blockbuster, and I don’t buy unproven video games anymore. Anything I touch should have a predefined motive. I have taken a step back. Today my approach in every situation is relatively reasonable. I look at the history of my involvement in a given situation to decide if that is a path worth continuing.

    Male & Female Consanguinity After the MeToo Movement

    It was only a decade ago when I caught heat from writing about men going their own way. I even suggested that the MeToo Movement is a trojan horse. Today, if you ask me, I’d say it’s sexual harassment to post half nude or nude pictures anywhere. But, a lot of men do not know their worth. They may see such abuse as a privilege. My reason for responding this way is because the person in question causes the men who see her picture to think about sex.

    Justified Remonstrances Free From Ill-considered Demands

    We have to ensure that, even as we call for police reforms, we do NOT alienate our police force. Regardless of our demands for sweeping changes in some of the methods they use, it is outright stupid to advocate for defunding and disbanding our police. If we look at what’s happening, we should see that the police are outstretched in the variety of situations they address. We must define police brutality as their use of unnecessary force against nonviolent suspects.

    Leave a Reply