This blog is about some of the negative manifestations of extreme feminism. Especially on the heterosexual couple. It is also about how men with dominant male traits should recognize them. In many circumstances, radical feminism generates deep resentment of masculinity. It also forces some feminists to seek to overthrow men who are in control or who have a naturally masculine spirit. How does that happen? By attempting to slay the contributing attributes that allow the male in question to be authoritative in the given relationship.
The extreme feminists reject the traditional male role of leadership and power. They often regard it as burdensome and solicit despairingly to overturn it. To achieve this, they may go after the things that fuel his self-confidence. His ability to have sex at will, his reputation, his income or his freedom. Since the radical feminist has limited access to a vast population of men, her main targets may be her spouse, her father or her boss at work. The radical feminist assumes that any male who is in a position of authority is somehow her enemy.
Many are excellent fathers, loving husbands under psychological attack because their radically feminist spouse who became socially engineered has targeted them as patriarchs.”
When radical feminists attack their selected target, the first area they strike is anything that is related to sexual matters. The goal is to deprive their mark of having heterosexual intercourse. By saying this, I’m not defending men who use their position of power to demand sex from vulnerable women. Nor am I speaking up for men who harass women sexually. I’m referring to genuine, devoted fathers. To spouses who because of extreme feminism, are suddenly under attack by a feminist who aims to kill his sex drive or diminish his self-confidence.
You will find that whenever this guy does something sweet, the radical or socially engineered feminist will ignore that. But when he does something wrong she will hold a long-term grudge against him.”
They can do this psychologically by influencing others not to have sex with him. Or if he is in a relationship or marriage, his partner may stop having sex with him. This tactic works to keep the man begging for sex. It forces him to demand sex in an approach that borders on spousal rape. If he does not require sex from his partner but instead seeks it from another woman, the radical feminist then explains that as cheating. The goal of the extreme feminist in this situation is to break the man’s confidence. They want to put him in a position where she dictates when or how he is allowed to have sex. However, the man realizes it and breaks every rule to maintain control of his sex life.
Another way of attacking the dominant male nature is to destroy a man’s distinguished reputation. You will find that they target and label the man in question of being a psychopath. He is crazy. The radical feminist does this by deeming his actions inappropriate. The man might play his music loudly while drinking alcohol and smoking a cigar when he’s in a good mood.
He may speak with power, and walk with an aura of authority. He may have strict rules with a reasonable and logical explanation for his decisions and actions. The radical feminist understanding his natural reaction to different situations may deliberately push this man to anger. Her goal might be to cause him to lose control of his temperament. While he rants and raves, the feminist then uses those angry words that he says to foster a grudge and justify her attack on his personality. Most times this attack is deliberate, but it can also be subconscious.
This tactic works to keep the man begging for sex.
It forces him to demand sex in an approach that borders on spousal rape.”
You will find that whenever this guy does something sweet, the radical or socially engineered feminist will ignore that. But when he does something wrong, she will hold a long-term grudge against him. Natural male behaviors include assertion, logic, maintaining discipline with a foot down or explaining away at his foolish tendencies. To obliterate his power, the extreme feminist strikes him as a villain, a rude, disrespectful or ill-bred person. Keep in mind that her goal is to shift what she considers as his male privilege in her favor. To rebel against what she believes is a systematic female subjugation. And I do not say this to suggest that the opposite cannot also be the case.
Another way in which extreme feminists may engage a confident male is by hindering his income stream. They do this by investigating every place where he gets his salary and accosting those institutions directly or indirectly with character slaying finger-pointing. The aim is to cause him to lose those contracts. They believe if he has LESS money he will be limited, he will have fewer options and therefore be easier for her to take control. They will try to remove his vices, cause a decline in sales in his business, have him lose his job or assign significant expenses on his resources, so he becomes financially constrained.
While he rants and raves, the feminist then uses those angry words that he says to foster a grudge and justify her attack on his personality.”
The extreme feminists may even try to remove this man from his home or car, and turn his children, family members, friends, and associates against him. The more alienated he is, the better. The more uncomfortable he becomes, the more reduced his financial prowess since now he has to spend extra to solve the new dilemmas that they have created for him. His ability to make payments is a force to reckon. Do not make the mistake that a man’s capital is NOT the primary object a radical feminist will seek when she goes to break the dominant male behavior in a man who she has targeted. After sex, wealth is often a significant area they attack when they try to cut him down.
When everything else fails, this means that he chooses to cheat rather than be sexually deprived or that he remains dominant in his principles of leadership, discipline, and culture. He is not disturbed by the unflattering name calls, and he is steadfast in his resolve. When he is like this, the radical feminist will term him as a patriarch, especially when she cannot end his income or revenue stream. When everything else fails, radical feminism will challenge the dominant man directly, push him to anger, so when he reacts, they will claim to be his victim and call the police.
Sometimes radical feminist women may accuse their dominant husbands of domestic assaults. Do not get me wrong here; some men are intruders and pigs who deserve for someone to send them to jail. But many are not. Many are excellent fathers, loving husbands under psychological attack because their radically feminist spouse who became socially engineered has targeted them as patriarchs. The worst part is when there are children involved, and the extreme feminist draws up a scheme to brainwash the children against their father or use a family court arrangement that is systematically biased towards males.*